Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40806487›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Self-Normalizing Multi-Omics Neural Network for Pan-Cancer Prognostication.

Asim Waqas, Aakash Tripathi, Sabeen Ahmed, Ashwin Mukund, Hamza Farooq, Joseph O Johnson, Paul A Stewart, Mia Naeini, Matthew B Schabath, Ghulam Rasool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Asim WaqasDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6834-4710
Aakash TripathiDepartment of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7231-0487
Sabeen AhmedDepartment of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0456-3073
Ashwin MukundDepartment of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9430-8414
Hamza FarooqCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5311-4368
Joseph O JohnsonAnalytic Microscopy Core Facility, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Paul A StewartHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0882-308X
Mia NaeiniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3909-0616
Matthew B SchabathDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-3216
Ghulam RasoolDepartment of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8551-0090

Funding

Quantitative Imaging Clinical Validation Center at Moffitt Cancer CenterU01CA200464 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI JOHN J HEINE, Matthew B. Schabath · 2016 to 2026
$9.2M
Moffitt Cancer Center Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource P30-CA076292National Science Foundation 903466, 2008690, 2234836, 2234468NIH HHS U01CA200464State of Florida Bankhead Coley Research Program 21B12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostic markers such as overall survival (OS) and tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) ratios, alongside diagnostic signatures like primary cancer-type classification, provide critical information for treatment selection, risk stratification, and longitudinal care planning across the oncology continuum. However, extracting these signals solely from sparse, high-dimensional multi-omics data remains a major challenge due to heterogeneity and frequent missingness in patient profiles. To address this challenge, we present SeNMo, a self-normalizing deep neural network trained on five heterogeneous omics layers-gene expression, DNA methylation, miRNA abundance, somatic mutations, and protein expression-along with the clinical variables, that learns a unified representation robust to missing modalities. Trained on more than 10,000 patient profiles across 32 tumor types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), SeNMo provides a baseline that can be readily fine-tuned for diverse downstream tasks. On a held-out TCGA test set, the model achieved a concordance index of 0.758 for OS prediction, while external evaluation yielded 0.73 on the CPTAC lung squamous cell carcinoma cohort and 0.66 on an independent 108-patient Moffitt Cancer Center cohort. Furthermore, on Moffitt's cohort, baseline SeNMo fine-tuned for TLS ratio prediction aligned with expert annotations (

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsMultiomicsMutationPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAscancerclassificationdeep learningmachine learningmultimodalmulti-omicsoncologypan-cancersurvival

Identifiers

PMID40806487
PMCPMC12347193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.