ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Fertility Protection in Female Cancer Patients: From Molecular Mechanisms of Gonadotoxic Therapies to Pharmacotherapeutic Possibilities.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From subclinical ovarian damage to reproductive outcomes: a translational perspective on PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- The role of anti-Müllerian hormone as a therapeutic agent to preserve the ovarian follicle pool during chemotherapy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Decoding the tumor-aging axis: from bench to clinical.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From Inflammation to Malignancy: The Link Between Endometriosis and Gynecological Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy are highly effective in treating malignancies. However, they carry a significant risk of harming the gonads and may lead to endocrine dysfunction and reproductive issues. This review outlines the molecular mechanisms of gonadotoxic therapies, focusing on radiation, alkylating agents, and platinum compounds. It discusses the loss of PMFs due to gonadotoxic exposure, including DNA double-strand breaks, oxidative stress, and dysregulated signaling pathways like PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR and TAp63-mediated apoptosis. Furthermore, it explores strategies to mitigate gonadal damage, including GnRH agonists, AMH, imatinib, melatonin, sphingolipid metabolites, G-CSF, mTOR inhibitors, AS101, and LH. These therapies, paired with existing fertility preservation methods, could safeguard reproductive and hormonal functions and improve the quality of life for young cancer patients. Despite the progress made in recent years in understanding gonadotoxic mechanisms, gaps remain due to questionable reliance on mouse models and the lack of models replicating human ovarian dynamics. Long-term studies are vital for wider analyses and exploration of protective strategies based on various animal models and clinical trials. It is essential to verify that these substances do not hinder the anti-cancer effectiveness of treatments or cause lasting DNA changes in granulosa cells, raising the risk of miscarriages and infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.