ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Proteomic Insights into Bacterial Responses to Antibiotics: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative approaches to therapeutic target discovery amid the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Target Discovery in ESKAPE Pathogens: An AI-Driven Framework from Omics-Based to Systems-Level Modeling and Clinical Translation.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Study on the Non-Target Metabolomics Effects of Tylosin onVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Bacterial secondary metabolites as resistance-modifying adjuvants: microbial origins, molecular mechanisms, and translational relevance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Integrated omics reveal a unique antibacterial mechanism of action for the small molecule HSI#6.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Understanding Drug Permeability inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is an escalating global threat that undermines the efficacy of modern antibiotics and places a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems-costing Europe alone over EUR 11.7 billion each year due to rising medical expenses and productivity losses. While genomics and transcriptomics have significantly advanced our understanding of the genetic foundations of resistance, they often fail to capture the dynamic, real-time adaptations that enable bacterial survival. Proteomics, particularly mass spectrometry-based strategies, bridges this gap by uncovering the functional protein-level changes that drive resistance, persistence, and tolerance under antibiotic pressure. In this review, we examine how proteomic approaches provide new insights into resistance mechanisms across various antibiotic classes, with a particular focus on β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones, highlighting clinically relevant pathogens, especially members of the ESKAPE group. Finally, we examine future directions, including the integration of proteomics with other omic technologies and the growing role of artificial intelligence in resistance prediction, paving the way for more predictive, personalized, and effective solutions to combat antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.