ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Molecular Determinants of Bone Plasticity Regeneration After Trauma: Forensic Consequences.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone tissue is one of the most remarkable examples of biological plasticity within the human body, with a high regenerative capacity and adaptation following traumatic injuries. This process is conducted through a series of complex and interlinked molecular mechanisms, which will be summarized in this study. The temporal progression of bone healing follows relatively predictable phases, characterized by variation in the concentration and/or activity of biomolecules such as BMP, VEGF, MMPs. The molecular understanding of bone plasticity and regeneration has potentially significant implications in forensic sciences. They were not extensively studied and implemented in practical, forensic environments, mainly due to their high costs and limited availability. However, they have potential uses in areas, such as the interpretation of skeletal trauma, the estimation of the post-traumatic intervals, the postmortem interval, or the differentiation between ante-, peri-, and postmortem injuries to the bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.