ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Real-World Evaluation of Microsatellite Instability Detection via Targeted NGS Panels in Routine Molecular Diagnostics.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic scoping review of the molecular pathogenesis of digestive system cancers (2013-2025).Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification as a Prognostic Factor for Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Lynch Syndrome as a Spectrum of Four Distinct Genetic Disorders: Toward Genotype-Guided Precision Management in the NGS Era.Cancers · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Pathways and Molecular Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Perspectives in Poland.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a clinically important biomarker for predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors and identifying individuals with Lynch syndrome. Although MSI detection has been incorporated into Illumina's next-generation tumor sequencing workflows, interpretation of the results remains challenging due to the absence of standardized thresholds and reporting criteria. In this retrospective study, we assessed the performance of MSI detection using Illumina's targeted NGS panels-TruSight Tumor 170 and TruSight Oncology 500. The NGS-based MSI results were compared to those obtained by the reference method, MSI-PCR, across multiple tumor types in a real-world cohort of 331 cancer patients. The NGS method demonstrated high concordance overall (AUC = 0.922), though sensitivity was lower in colorectal cancers (AUC = 0.867) due to broader score variability and overlapping distributions. Our findings support the clinical utility of Illumina's NGS-derived MSI scores for identifying MSI-H tumors, with a recommended MSI score cut-off value of ≥13.8%. Additionally, a borderline group was introduced, defined by an MSI score ranging from ≥8.7% to <13.8%. Within this range, the integration of TMB into the MSI classification workflow significantly improves diagnostic accuracy. For samples that remain inconclusive, orthogonal confirmation using MSI-PCR is advised to ensure accurate MSI classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.