Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40806268›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

A Multimodal AI Framework for Automated Multiclass Lung Disease Diagnosis from Respiratory Sounds with Simulated Biomarker Fusion and Personalized Medication Recommendation.

Abdullah, Zulaikha Fatima, Jawad Abdullah, José Luis Oropeza Rodríguez, Grigori Sidorov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

AbdullahCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7983-2189
Zulaikha FatimaFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore Campus, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0001-6154-1893
Jawad AbdullahDepartment of Computer Sciences, Bahria University, Lahore 54600, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0000-9035-642X
José Luis Oropeza RodríguezCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8308-8882
Grigori SidorovCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-3522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory diseases represent a persistent global health challenge, underscoring the need for intelligent, accurate, and personalized diagnostic and therapeutic systems. Existing methods frequently suffer from limitations in diagnostic precision, lack of individualized treatment, and constrained adaptability to complex clinical scenarios. To address these challenges, our study introduces a modular AI-powered framework that integrates an audio-based disease classification model with simulated molecular biomarker profiles to evaluate the feasibility of future multimodal diagnostic extensions, alongside a synthetic-data-driven prescription recommendation engine. The disease classification model analyzes respiratory sound recordings and accurately distinguishes among eight clinical classes: bronchiectasis, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiolitis, and healthy respiratory state. The proposed model achieved a classification accuracy of 99.99% on a holdout test set, including 94.2% accuracy on pediatric samples. In parallel, the prescription module provides individualized treatment recommendations comprising drug, dosage, and frequency trained on a carefully constructed synthetic dataset designed to emulate real-world prescribing logic.The model achieved over 99% accuracy in medication prediction tasks, outperforming baseline models such as those discussed in research. Minimal misclassification in the confusion matrix and strong clinician agreement on 200 prescriptions (Cohen's κ = 0.91 [0.87-0.94] for drug selection, 0.78 [0.74-0.81] for dosage, 0.96 [0.93-0.98] for frequency) further affirm the system's reliability. Adjusted clinician disagreement rates were 2.7% (drug), 6.4% (dosage), and 1.5% (frequency). SHAP analysis identified age and smoking as key predictors, enhancing model explainability. Dosage accuracy was 91.3%, and most disagreements occurred in renal-impaired and pediatric cases. However, our study is presented strictly as a proof-of-concept. The use of synthetic data and the absence of access to real patient records constitute key limitations. A trialed clinical deployment was conducted under a controlled environment with a positive rate of satisfaction from experts and users, but the proposed system must undergo extensive validation with de-identified electronic medical records (EMRs) and regulatory scrutiny before it can be considered for practical application. Nonetheless, the findings offer a promising foundation for the future development of clinically viable AI-assisted respiratory care tools.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomarkersLung DiseasesPrecision MedicineRespiratory SoundsAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersasthmaattention-based prescription modelingaudio-based diagnosisbiomarker simulationclinical decision support system (CDSS)COPDdeep learninglung disease classificationmolecular feature fusionmultimodal AIpersonalized medication recommendationpneumoniaprecision healthcarerespiratory sound analysissynthetic medical data

Identifiers

PMID40806268
PMCPMC12346566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.