Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40806033›Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

Sustainable Nutrition and Food Allergy: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Caterina Anania, Barbara Cuomo, Enza D'Auria, Fabio Decimo, Giuliana Giannì, Giovanni Cosimo Indirli, Enrica Manca, Filippo Mondì, Erica Pendezza, Marco Ugo Andrea Sartorio and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Caterina AnaniaDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-8632
Barbara CuomoCentral Operative Unit of Pediatrics and Allergy Center for Children and Adults, Santa Rosa Hospital, 01010 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8405-780X
Enza D'AuriaAllergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics-Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20154 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2750-5810
Fabio DecimoDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Giuliana GiannìPediatrics Department, Allergology and Immunology, Italian Society of Pediatric Allergology and Immunology (SIAIP) Regional Referent for Emilia-Romagna, 57124 Livorno Ospedali Riuniti, Italy.
Giovanni Cosimo IndirliPediatric Independent Researcher, Italian Society of Paediatric Allergology and Immunology (SIAIP) Regional Referent for Puglia and Basilicata, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Enrica MancaPediatrics Department, Policlinico Riuniti, University Hospital of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8723-0129
Filippo MondìDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-1880-0995
Erica PendezzaDepartment of Pediatrics Allergy Center, IRCCS Institute Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy.
Marco Ugo Andrea SartorioPediatric Allergology Unit, Department of Childhood and Developmental Medicine, Fatebenefratelli-Sacco Hospital, 20121 Milan, Italy.
Mauro CalvaniOperative Unit of Pediatrics, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative proteins denote non-traditional, high-protein foods. These innovative sources aim to compete with conventional animal products by providing protein-rich, sustainable, nutritious, and flavorful options. Currently, five main categories of alternative proteins are being developed: plant-based proteins, cultured meat, single-cell proteins, edible insects, and seaweed. Nonetheless, several chemical and microbiological food safety hazards are associated with these alternatives Incorporating novel protein sources into food products may heighten the prevalence of existing food allergies. This could arise from extracting proteins from their natural matrices and utilizing them at significantly higher concentrations. Additionally, the introduction of new proteins may lead to the development of novel food allergies. Proteins that are currently seldom or never consumed may cause primary sensitisation or trigger cross-reactivity with known allergens. To date, alternative proteins have not been thoroughly studied for their allergenic potential, and there is no standardised method for assessing this risk. This review aims to explore non-traditional protein sources, discussing their nutritional and functional properties, as well as their potential allergenicity based on available research. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases. We used specific keywords and MESH terms. A total of 157 studies were included in the review. The studies reviewed in our analysis reveal significant limitations, such as inconsistent methodologies, limited participant numbers, and a lack of long-term data, which hinder the ability to make clear conclusions regarding the safety of these new proteins for individuals with allergies. To address current challenge, future research should integrate food science, regulatory perspectives and advanced technologies.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsFood HypersensitivityNutritional StatusAllergensAnimalsHumansNutritive ValuePlant ProteinsAllergensDietary ProteinsPlant Proteinsallergenicitycultured meatedible insectsnovel foodplant-based proteinsseaweedsingle-cell proteins

Identifiers

PMID40806033
PMCPMC12348080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.