Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40805879›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Systematic Review of Tuberculosis Stigma Reduction Interventions.

Nadira Aitambayeva, Altyn Aringazina, Laila Nazarova, Kamila Faizullina, Magripa Bapayeva, Nazerke Narymbayeva, Shnara Svetlanova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadira AitambayevaDepartment of Public Health and Social Sciences, Kazakhstan's Medical University "KSPH", Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.
Altyn AringazinaSchool of Health Sciences, Almaty Management University AlmaU, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-2394
Laila NazarovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Evidence-Based Medicine and Biostatistics, Kazakhstan's Medical University "KSPH", Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0001-2197-3253
Kamila FaizullinaAlmaty City Branch of the Salidat Kairbekova National Research Center for Health Development, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2031-9444
Magripa BapayevaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kazakhstan's Medical University "KSPH", Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.
Nazerke NarymbayevaDepartment of Health Management, Kazakhstan Medical University "KSPH", Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-8158
Shnara SvetlanovaDepartment of Nursing, Kazakhstan's Medical University "KSPH", Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0002-4546-1452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStigma associated with tuberculosis (TB) continues to undermine patient well-being, treatment adherence, and public health goals and objectives. This study aims to systematically review the literature to identify and synthesize TB stigma reduction interventions published between 2015 and 2025.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included those with qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs that focused on interventions related to TB-related stigma. We categorized the studies into three groups: (1) intervention development studies, (2) TB treatment programs with stigma reduction outcomes, (3) stigma-specific interventions. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

resultsA total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies focused on co-developing stigma interventions, which incorporated multi-level and multicomponent strategies targeting internalized, enacted, anticipated, and intersectional stigma. Two studies assessed TB treatment-related interventions (e.g., home-based care, digital adherence tools) with incidental stigma reduction effects. The remaining seven studies implemented stigma-targeted interventions, including educational programs, video-based therapy, peer-led support, and anti-self-stigma toolkits. Interventions addressed stigma across individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels.

conclusionsThis review highlights the evolution and diversification of TB stigma interventions over the past decade. While earlier interventions emphasized education and support, recent strategies increasingly integrate peer leadership, digital platforms, and socio-ecological frameworks. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive, contextually grounded interventions that reflect the lived experiences of people affected by TB.

Indexed as

cascade of carediscriminationevaluationTB

Identifiers

PMID40805879
PMCPMC12346600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.