ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Assessing the Divergent Soil Phosphorus Recovery Strategies in Domesticated and Wild Crops.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The root exudates of wild tomato compared to a modern variety maintain elevated soluble soil phosphorus by interacting with rhizosphere microbiota.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics Reveals Domestication-Associated Shifts in Phosphorus Adaptation Strategies in Tomato.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Phosphorus Efficiency in Cultivated and Wild Potato Genotypes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-essential phosphorus (P) is a sparingly available mineral in soils. Phosphorus fertilizers-produced by the transformation of insoluble to soluble phosphates-are thus applied to agroecosystems. With advancements in commercial agriculture, crops have been increasingly adapted to grow in fertile environments. Wild crop relatives, however, are adapted to grow in unfertilized soils. In response to these two conditions of P bioavailability (fertilized agroecosystems and unfertilized natural soils), domesticated crops and wild species employ different strategies to grow and develop. It is essential to understand strategies related to P acquisition that may have been lost to domestication, and here we present, for the first time, that across species, modern cultivars engage in physical (i.e., root morphological) mechanisms while their wild relatives promote ecological (i.e., root-microbial) mechanisms. Domesticated crops showcase shallower root system architecture and engage in topsoil foraging to acquire P from the nutrient-stratified environments common to fertilized agroecosystems. Wild species associate with P-cycling bacteria and AM fungi. This divergence in P recovery strategies is a novel delineation of current research that has implications for enhancing agricultural sustainability. By identifying the traits related to P recovery that have been lost to domestication, we can strengthen the P recovery responses by modern crops and reduce P fertilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.