ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing Maize Production and Soil Microbiome Structure Through Reduced Chemical Nitrogen Supplemented with Organic Fertilizer.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of reduced nitrogen combined with an organic fertilizer on maize yield, soil microbial communities, and enzyme activities to optimize fertilization strategies. A field experiment on cinnamon soil in Yuncheng, Shanxi, was conducted and included six treatments: no fertilizer (CK), conventional N (NC0, 180 kg N/ha), sole organic fertilizer (CN0, 3000 kg/ha), and reduced-N + organic fertilizer (CN1: 90 kg N/ha + 3000 kg/ha; CN2: 135 kg N/ha + 3000 kg/ha; and CN3: 180 kg N/ha + 3000 kg/ha). We analyzed yield components, soil nutrients, urease and invertase activities, and bacterial community structure (16S rRNA sequencing). The key results are as follows: CN1 achieved the highest yield (9764.87 kg/ha), which was 46.8% higher than CK. CN2 maintained comparable yields while delivering higher enzyme activities and microbial abundance, positioning this strategy as suitable for soil remediation. Co-application enriched two beneficial phyla, Proteobacteria and Planctomycetota (19% in CN2), with Proteobacteria positively correlating with urease activity and alkali-hydrolyzable N (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.