ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Impact of an Object's Surface Material and Preparatory Actions on the Accuracy of Optical Coordinate Measurement.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical coordinate measurement is a universal technique that aligns with the rapid development of industrial technologies and new materials. Nevertheless, can this technique be consistently effective when applied to the precise measurement of all types of materials? As shown in this article, an analysis of optical measurement systems reveals that some materials cause difficulties during the scanning process. This article details the matting process, resulting, as demonstrated, in lower measurement uncertainty values compared to the pre-matting state, and identifies materials for which applying a matting spray significantly improves the measurement quality. The authors propose a classification of materials into easy-to-scan and hard-to-scan groups, along with specific procedures to improve measurements, especially for the latter. Tests were conducted in an accredited Laboratory of Coordinate Metrology using an articulated arm with a laser probe. Measured objects included spheres made of ceramic, tungsten carbide (including a matte finish), aluminum oxide, titanium nitride-coated steel, and photopolymer resin, with reference diameters established by a high-precision Leitz PMM 12106 coordinate measuring machine. Diameters were determined from point clouds obtained via optical measurements using the best-fit method, both before and after matting. Color measurements using a spectrocolorimeter supplemented this study to assess the effect of matting on surface color. The results revealed correlations between the material type and measurement accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.