ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Visualization of Light-Impinging Geometry in Nonlinear Photocurrents of Vertical Optoelectronic Devices.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonlinear photocurrents (NPs) are electrical currents expected to be measured at the electrodes of a device consisting of an active area, sensitive to light, with a higher-order in-electric field where light-impinging geometry (LIG) is the determining factor in the experimental observation. Although the phenomenology of this light-matter interaction is clear for light directed on a lateral device plane with well-defined azimuthal and incidence angles, as well as light polarization angle, it can be quite complicated for a vertical device structure and reconsideration of the expected NP contributions is necessary in the latter case. In this study, we used a visual approach to describe the LIG for vertical device structures using a specific example of a photodiode, and showed that these angles must be redefined, namely, the interchangeability of azimuthal and incidence angles. The influence of device geometry-dependent optical illumination is reflected on the behavior of NP; therefore, the NPs that are known to be forbidden in certain LIGs can be allowed and vice versa. These results pave the way for the utilization of NPs in flexible optoelectronic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.