ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimal Design and Application of Universal Cementitious Material Prepared Using Full Industrial Solid Wastes.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microstructural and Mechanical Property Analysis of Oil Shale Semi-Coke Slag Composite Cementitious Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Synergistic Utilization of Multi-Source Industrial Solid Wastes in Cementitious Materials: A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study developed a full solid waste-based cementitious material (ISWs-CM) using steel slag (SS), ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), phosphorus slag (PS), carbide slag (CS), and desulfurized gypsum (DG) to completely replace cement. A two-layer optimization strategy, combining three chemical moduli and simplex lattice experiments, was employed to determine the proportion and to investigate the impact of proportions on the uniaxial compressive strength of mortar. As an application case, the ISWs-CM with the optimal proportion was employed to stabilize aeolian sand, and its effectiveness as a cement substitute and the underlying mechanisms were investigated. The results indicated that the ISW proportion that maximized the strength of the mortar was SS:GGBFS:PS:CS = 5:20:20:40. The strength of the mortar was enhanced when the proportion of GGBFS exhibiting the highest reactivity was increased and also increased initially and then decreased with an increase in CS when the dosage of GGBFS was fixed. The aeolian sand stabilized by ISW-CM exhibited higher strength than that stabilized with cement. The greater number and variety of hydration products resulted in denser connections and encapsulation of sand particles, which highlights the synergistic effect of ISWs and the potential of ISW-CM as a cement replacement across diverse applications including aeolian sand stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.