ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Scale Study on Ultrasonic Cutting of Nomex Honeycomb Composites of Disc Cutters.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the issues of burr formation, structural deformation, and tearing in the conventional machining of Nomex honeycomb composites, this study aims to clarify the mechanisms by which ultrasonic vibration-assisted cutting enhances machining quality. A multi-scale analysis framework is developed to examine the effects of ultrasonic vibration on fiber distribution, cell-level shear response, and the overall cutting mechanics. At the microscale, analyses show that ultrasonic vibration mitigates stress concentrations, thereby shortening fiber length. At the mesoscale, elastic buckling and plastic yielding models show that ultrasonic vibration lowers shear strength and modifies the deformation. A macro-scale comparison of cutting behavior with and without ultrasonic vibration was conducted. The results indicate that the intermittent contact effect induced by vibration significantly reduces cutting force. Specifically, at an amplitude of 40 μm, the cutting force decreased by approximately 29.7% compared to the condition without ultrasonic vibration, with an average prediction error below 8.6%. Compared to conventional machining, which causes the honeycomb angle to deform to approximately 130°, ultrasonic vibration preserves the original 120° geometry and reduces burr length by 36%. These results demonstrate that ultrasonic vibration effectively reduces damage through multi-scale interactions, offering theoretical guidance for high-precision machining of fiber-reinforced composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.