Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40805322›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Site Application of Thermally Conductive Concrete Pavement: A Comparison of Its Thermal Effectiveness with Normal Concrete Pavement.

Joo-Young Kim, Jae-Suk Ryou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joo-Young KimHL Halla Corporation, 81, Pulmugol-ro, Paju-si 10849, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Suk RyouCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, Hanyang University, Jaesung Civil Engineering Building, 222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5567-2742

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT RS-2025-00561232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the thermal effectiveness of thermally conductive concrete pavements (TCPs) using silicon carbide (SiC) as a fine aggregate replacement was investigated, compared with that of ordinary Portland cement pavements (OPCPs). The most important purpose of this study is to improve the thermal performance of concrete pavement. Additionally, this study utilized improved thermal properties to enhance the efficiency of pavement heating to prevent icing and snow stacking. Both mixtures met the Korean standards for air content (4.5-6%) and slump (80-150 mm), demonstrating adequate workability. TCP exhibited a higher mechanical performance, with average compressive and flexural strengths of 42.88 MPa and 7.35 MPa, respectively, exceeding the required targets of a 30 MPa compressive strength and a 4.5 MPa flexural strength. The improved strength was mainly attributed to the filler effect and partly due to the van der Waals interactions of the SiC particles. Thermal conductivity tests showed a significant improvement in the TCP (3.20 W/mK), which was approximately twice that of OPCP (1.59 W/mK), indicating an enhanced heat transfer efficiency. In winter field tests, TCP effectively maintained high surface temperatures, overcoming heat loss and outperforming the OPCP. In the site experiment, thermal efficiency was clearly shown in the temperature at the center of the TCP, which was 3.5 °C higher than at the center of the OPCP at the coldest time. These improvements suggest that SiC-reinforced concrete pavements can be practically utilized for effective snow removal and ice mitigation in road systems.

Indexed as

concreteicing/snow preventionpavementthermal conductivitywireless data monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40805322
PMCPMC12346923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.