Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40805304›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Review on Passivation Strategies for Germanium-Based Thermophotovoltaic Devices.

Pablo Martín, Ignacio Rey-Stolle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo MartínInstituto de Energía Solar, ETSI de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-1661
Ignacio Rey-StolleInstituto de Energía Solar, ETSI de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4919-5609

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación TED2021-131990B-I00Consejeria de Educación, Ciencia y Universidades de la Comunidad de Madrid PIPF-2022/ECO-25892European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR TED2021-131990B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in germanium electronic devices is experiencing a comeback thanks to their suitability for a wide range of new applications, like CMOS transistors, quantum technology or infrared photonics. Among these applications, Ge-based thermophotovoltaic converters could become the backbone of thermo-electrical batteries. However, these devices are still far from the efficiency threshold needed for industrial deployment, with surface recombination as the main limiting factor for the material. In this work, we discuss the main passivation techniques developed for germanium photovoltaic and thermophotovoltaic devices, summarizing their main advantages and disadvantages. The analysis reveals that surface recombination velocities as low as 2.7 cm/s and 1.3 cm/s have already been reported for

Indexed as

germaniumhigh-efficiency photovoltaicspassivation strategiessurface passivationthermophotovoltaics (TPV)

Identifiers

PMID40805304
PMCPMC12347745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.