ReviewCancers2025
Neuroinflammation in Radiation Maculopathy: A Pathophysiologic and Imaging Perspective.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Classification of Radiation Maculopathy as a Predictor of Functional Response to Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Five-Year Treatment Outcomes with 0.19 µg Fluocinolone Acetonide in Radiation-Induced Maculopathy.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiation maculopathy (RM) is a delayed, sight-threatening complication of ocular radiotherapy. Traditionally regarded as a pure microvascular disease, emerging evidence points to the central role played by retinal neuroinflammation, driven by microglial activation and cytokine dysregulation affecting both the retina and the choroid. Hyperreflective retinal foci, neuroinflammatory in origin (I-HRF), visualized through advanced imaging modalities such as spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), have been identified as early and critical biomarkers of both preclinical and clinical retinal neuroinflammation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review synthesizes findings from experimental and clinical studies to explore the pathophysiology of neuroinflammation and the associated imaging parameters in RM.
resultsThe integration of experimental and clinical evidence specifically underscores the significance of I-HRF as an early indicator of neuroinflammation in RM. OCT enables the identification and quantification of these biomarkers, which are linked to microglial activation and cytokine dysregulation.
conclusionsThe pathophysiology of RM has evolved from a predominantly vascular condition to one strongly secondary to neuroinflammatory mechanisms involving the retina and choroid. In particular, I-HRF, as early biomarkers, offers the potential for preclinical diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, paving the way for improved management of this sight-threatening complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.