ArticleCancers2025
Affinity Affects the Functional Potency of Anti-GD2 Antibodies by Target-Mediated Drug Disposition.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative evidence on the independent contribution of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to anti-GD2 immunotherapy in neuroblastoma: a systematic review and gap analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Circulating free and low-density lipoprotein-bound GD2 can competeJournal of circulating biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHigh-risk neuroblastoma patients are treated with approved anti-ganglioside GD2 antibodies of moderate (dinutuximab beta; DB) and higher binding affinity (naxitamab; NAXI). We evaluated the functional potency of DB compared to NAXI and investigated the target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD).
methodsTumor spheroids were generated from neuroblastoma cells with varying GD2 expression, stably expressing iRFP680 as a viability marker. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) were assessed in a long-term life-cell viability assay using serial dilutions of the GD2 antibodies. Binding activity was determined by flow cytometry. Processes involved in TMDD were analyzed, including antibody binding to dead tumor cells and to soluble GD2 (sGD2), antibody internalization into tumor and immune cells and the impact of sGD2 on DB and NAXI-mediated ADCC.
resultsDB and NAXI mediated a concentration-dependent ADCC response against GD2-positive spheroids and no response against GD2-negative spheroids. DB showed a significantly higher ADCC potency than NAXI in all GD2-positive spheroid models. Binding activity of DB and NAXI was not significantly different. However, the decrease of anti-GD2 antibody binding to viable GD2-positive tumor cells following co-incubation with dead GD2-positive tumor cells or sGD2 was significantly higher for NAXI than DB. Additionally, we found an increased internalization of NAXI compared to DB by tumor cells and particularly CD64+ monocytes. Finally, sGD2 impaired NAXI-mediated ADCC to a significantly greater extent than DB-mediated ADCC.
conclusionsDB has a higher ADCC potency over NAXI at clinically relevant concentrations, attributed to stronger TMDD effects of NAXI compared to DB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.