ArticleCancers2025
Monte Carlo Gradient Boosted Trees for Cancer Staging: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of an XGBoost-Based Machine Learning Model With Nomogram for Predicting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Patients.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026Article
- A Multi-omics and Machine Learning Framework Identifies Plasma SBDS as a Causal Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- Multimodal Late-Fusion of Radiomics, Clinical Data, and Demographics Enhances Personalized Survival Prediction in NSCLC.Cancers · 2026Article
- Integrating Blood-Based Immune-Inflammation Biomarkers into Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prognostic Models in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A predictive study of glycaemic reversal in Chinese individuals with prediabetes based on machine learning: a 5-year cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms are commonly employed for classification and interpretation of high-dimensional data. The classification task is often broken down into two separate procedures, and different methods are applied to achieve accurate results and produce interpretable outcomes. First, an effective subset of high-dimensional features must be extracted and then the selected subset will be used to train a classifier. Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT) is an ensemble model and, particularly due to their robustness, ability to model complex nonlinear interactions, and feature interpretability, they are well suited for complex applications. XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) is a high-performance implementation of GBT that incorporates regularization, parallel computation, and efficient tree pruning that makes it a suitable efficient, interpretable, and scalable classifier with potential applications to medical data analysis. In this study, a Monte Carlo Gradient Boosted Trees (MCGBT) model is proposed for both feature reduction and classification. The proposed MCGBT method was applied to a lung cancer dataset for feature identification and classification. The dataset contains 107 radiomics which are quantitative imaging biomarkers extracted from CT scans. A reduced set of 12 radiomics were identified, and patients were classified into different cancer stages. Cancer staging accuracy of 90.3% across 100 independent runs was achieved which was on par with that obtained using the full set of 107 radiomics, enabling lean and deployable classifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.