ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Field-Compatible Cytometric Assessment of Epididymal Alpaca Sperm Viability and Acrosomal Integrity Using Fluorochrome.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In remote alpaca breeding regions, access to advanced sperm analysis laboratories is limited. This study validates a practical cytometric method for evaluating sperm viability and acrosomal integrity in epididymal alpaca sperm using early fluorochrome staining, formaldehyde fixation, and intermediate storage. Thirty-two testes were transported at 5 °C, and spermatozoa were collected from the cauda epididymis. After morphometric screening, 26 samples were included. Aliquots were stained with Zombie Green (viability) and FITC-PSA (acrosomal integrity), at time zero. Each aliquot was divided for cytometric analysis at T0 (immediately), T24 (24 h after formaldehyde fixation) and T1w (1 week post-fixation). Fixed samples showed higher viability and acrosomal integrity values (T24: 70.75%, 97.24%; T1w: 71.80%, 97.21%) than T0 (67.63%, 95.89%). This may reflect fluorescence alterations associated with fixation. Strong correlations and Bland-Altman analysis confirmed consistency across time points. This method enables accurate sperm quality evaluation up to one week after collection, offering a useful tool for reproductive monitoring in field conditions without immediate analysis. Further research on ejaculated semen and field protocols is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.