ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Selection Signature Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequences to Identify Genome Differences Between Selected and Unselected Holstein Cattle.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Ancestry and Genome-Wide Association Study Combined with Functional Enrichment Analyses Reveal Candidate Genes for Body Conformation Traits in Hexi Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A unique line of Holstein cattle has been maintained without selection in Minnesota since 1964. After many generations, unselected cattle produce less milk, but have better reproductive performance and health traits when compared with contemporary cows. Comparisons between this line of unselected Holstein and those under selection provide useful insights that connect selection and complex traits in cattle. Utilizing these unique resources and sequence data, we sought to identify genome changes due to selection. We sequenced 30 unselected and 54 selected Holstein cattle and compared their sequence variants to identify selection signatures. After many years, the two populations showed completely different patterns in their genome-level population structures and linkage disequilibrium. By integrating signals from five different detection methods, we detected consensus selection signatures from at least four methods covering 14,533 SNPs and 155 protein-coding genes. An integrated analysis of selection signatures with gene annotation, pathways, and the cattle QTL database demonstrated that the genomic regions under selection are related to milk productivity, health, and reproductive efficiency. The polygenic nature of these complex traits is evident from hundreds of selection signatures and candidate genes, suggesting that long-term artificial selection has acted on the whole genome rather than a few major genes. In summary, our study identified candidate selection signatures underlying phenotypic differences between unselected and selected Holstein cows and revealed insights into the genetic basis of complex traits in cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.