ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Could Individual Variability in Resistance to Cryopreservation ("Freezability") Serve as a Biomarker Reflecting Boar Fertility?
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subfertile boars often go undetected until they cause significant reproductive losses. Current semen quality assessments are limited in their ability to predict fertility, highlighting the need for complementary biomarkers. This study explored whether semen freezability could serve as an indirect indicator of boar fertility. Eighteen boars were classified based on historical fertility records and semen freezability, assessed by post-thaw quality. Fresh and post-thaw semen samples were analyzed using the CASA system and fluorescence microscopy. High-fertility boars showed significantly better motility and functional sperm parameters in fresh semen compared to low-fertility boars. However, these differences were mostly lost after cryopreservation. Conversely, boars with good freezability had consistently better post-thaw semen quality, though this did not correlate directly with higher fertility outcomes. Notably, a combined analysis revealed that boars with both high fertility and poor freezability had the lowest post-thaw semen quality. This suggests that cryopreservation may expose hidden sperm defects not detectable in fresh semen. Total motility was the only parameter associated with both fertility and freezability. In conclusion, while freezability alone may not directly predict fertility, it may help identify low-performing males. The combined assessment of fresh semen motility and freezability could support more effective boar selection strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.