Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804970›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Could Individual Variability in Resistance to Cryopreservation ("Freezability") Serve as a Biomarker Reflecting Boar Fertility?

Eduardo de Mercado, Helena Nieto-Cristóbal, Adrián Martín-San Juan, María José Martinez-Alborcia, Manuel Álvarez-Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduardo de MercadoDepartment of Animal Reproduction, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0321-2431
Helena Nieto-CristóbalDepartment of Animal Reproduction, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-9467
Adrián Martín-San JuanDepartment of Animal Reproduction, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
María José Martinez-AlborciaTopigs Norsvin España SLU-AIM Ibérica, 28290 Las Rozas, Spain.
Manuel Álvarez-RodríguezDepartment of Animal Reproduction, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0120-354X

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia Innovación y Universidades CNS2023-144564Ministerio de Ciencia Innovación y Universidades PID2019-108320RJI00Ministerio de Ciencia Innovación y Universidades PID2022-136561OB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia Innovación y Universidades RYC2020-028615-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subfertile boars often go undetected until they cause significant reproductive losses. Current semen quality assessments are limited in their ability to predict fertility, highlighting the need for complementary biomarkers. This study explored whether semen freezability could serve as an indirect indicator of boar fertility. Eighteen boars were classified based on historical fertility records and semen freezability, assessed by post-thaw quality. Fresh and post-thaw semen samples were analyzed using the CASA system and fluorescence microscopy. High-fertility boars showed significantly better motility and functional sperm parameters in fresh semen compared to low-fertility boars. However, these differences were mostly lost after cryopreservation. Conversely, boars with good freezability had consistently better post-thaw semen quality, though this did not correlate directly with higher fertility outcomes. Notably, a combined analysis revealed that boars with both high fertility and poor freezability had the lowest post-thaw semen quality. This suggests that cryopreservation may expose hidden sperm defects not detectable in fresh semen. Total motility was the only parameter associated with both fertility and freezability. In conclusion, while freezability alone may not directly predict fertility, it may help identify low-performing males. The combined assessment of fresh semen motility and freezability could support more effective boar selection strategies.

Indexed as

boar spermfertilityfreezabilitysperm quality

Identifiers

PMID40804970
PMCPMC12345589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.