ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Therapeutic and Prognostic Relevance of Cancer Stem Cell Populations in Endometrial Cancer: A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomedicine-Mediated Autophagy Modulation in Placental Impairment Versus Cancers: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Fueling the Seed: Growth Factors and Cytokines Driving Cancer Stem Cells in Gynecological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biggest challenge in cancer therapy is tumor resistance to the classical approach. Thus, research interest has shifted toward the cancer stem cell population (CSC). CSCs are a small subpopulation of cancer cells within tumors with self-renewal, differentiation, and metastasis/malignant potential. They are involved in tumor initiation and development, metastasis, and recurrence.
methodA narrative review of significant scientific publications related to the topic and its applicability in endometrial cancer (EC) was performed with the aim of identifying current knowledge about the identification of CSC populations in endometrial cancer, their biological significance, prognostic impact, and therapeutic targeting.
resultsTherapy against the tumor population alone has no or negligible effect on CSCs. CSCs, due to their stemness and therapeutic resistance, cause tumor relapse. They target CSCs that may lead to noticeable persistent tumoral regression. Also, they can be used as a predictive marker for poor prognosis. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) demonstrated that the cultured cells strongly expressed stemness-related genes, such as SOX-2 (sex-determining region Y-box 2), NANOG (Nanog homeobox), and Oct 4 (octamer-binding protein 4). The expression of surface markers CD133+ and CD44+ was found on CSC as stemness markers. Along with surface markers, transcription factors such as NF-kB, HIF-1a, and b-catenin were also considered therapeutic targets. Hypoxia is another vital feature of the tumor environment and aids in the maintenance of the stemness of CSCs. This involves the hypoxic activation of the WNT/b-catenin pathway, which promotes tumor survival and metastasis. Specific antibodies have been investigated against CSC markers; for example, anti-CD44 antibodies have been demonstrated to have potential against different CSCs in preclinical investigations. Anti-CD-133 antibodies have also been developed. Targeting the CSC microenvironment is a possible drug target for CSCs. Focusing on stemness-related genes, such as the transcription pluripotency factors SOX2, NANOG, and OCT4, is another therapeutic option.
conclusionsStemness surface and gene markers can be potential prognostic biomarkers and management approaches for cases with drug-resistant endometrial cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.