ArticleMedical physics2025
A comprehensive comparative study of generative adversarial network architectures for synthetic computed tomography generation in the abdomen.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing thoracic synthetic computed tomography generation from magnetic resonance imaging: the role of Fourier transform and other key factors.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- CycleGan-based kV-to-MV image translation for potential in vivo dosimetry application: concept proposal and cross-institutional validation.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- A comprehensive comparative study of generative adversarial network architectures for synthetic computed tomography generation in the abdomen.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic Resonance (MR)-based synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) generation is an emerging promising technique, required for the transition from conventional planning workflows to MR-only radiotherapy planning. This shift aims to replace CT acquisition with a sCT improving both cost efficiency and burden to the patient. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown some of the best performance in this area. PURPOSE: This study aims to identify optimal approaches to improve the quality and clinical applicability of MR-based sCT generation for treatment planning by performing an extensive comparison of GAN architectures and parameters thereof. It focuses on the abdominal region, which still lacks certified medical products for sCT generation.
methodsIn order to improve the current state of deep learning technologies, we generated sCTs based on abdominal MR images of 154 cancer patients using GANs, varying the following parameters: (1) generator architectures (U-Net, ResNet); (2) GAN architectures trained in paired (Pix2Pix) and unpaired fashion (CycleGAN and CUT); (3) number of input-output channels (2D, 2.5D); (4) training set size. The quality of sCT generation was assessed by using both image similarity and dosimetric metrics; correlation between the two was evaluated. The dosimetric accuracy was evaluated through an automated process that compared the dose distributions of photon treatment plans calculated on sCT and CT images, using Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH) parameters for tumor and organs at risk.
resultsThe Pix2Pix model, trained in paired fashion with 2.5D input-output channels and a ResNet generator emerged as the best-performing model, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE, mean) of 63.21 HU, a planning target volume Dmean difference of -0.09%, and no outliers above 2% for other DVH parameters. This configuration addressed prior challenges of Pix2Pix with bone and rigid organ boundary generation, delivering robust results even for cases with significant air pockets. The 2D input-output channel configuration showed beneficial for GANs trained in unpaired fashion, achieving a mean MAE of 66.97 HU for CycleGAN and 69.49 HU for CUT. Both delivered clinically applicable results, with mean DVH discrepancies below 0.8%. Expanding the training set size was essential for minimizing outliers in dosimetric parameters. High correlation was observed between the image similarity metrics-MAE, MAE bones, structural similarity index measure-and target DVH parameters, with Pearson coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.9. However, within the clinically relevant range of DVH deviations (± 2%), stochastic variations obscured linear trends.
conclusionsThe study provided a new benchmark for the abdominal sCT generation task, showing its clinical applicability for treatment planning and further advancing the state-of-the-art. This study also confirmed that image similarity metrics alone can not reliably predict small dosimetric deviations within a clinical threshold; but contributed by identifying specific metrics that correlate with DVH discrepancies above ± 5%, offering valuable tools for training, evaluation, and standardization of reporting across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.