Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804793›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

A comprehensive comparative study of generative adversarial network architectures for synthetic computed tomography generation in the abdomen.

Mariia Lapaeva, Agustina La Greca Saint-Esteven, Philipp Wallimann, Nicolaus Andratschke, Matthias Guckenberger, Manuel Günther, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, Riccardo Dal Bello

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariia LapaevaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3280-3409
Agustina La Greca Saint-EstevenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-611X
Philipp WallimannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7110-6617
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-5916
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-9071
Manuel GüntherArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Group, Department of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1489-7448
Stephanie Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-1522
Riccardo Dal BelloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8755-377X

Funding

Clinical Research Priority Programme "Artificial intelligence in Oncological Imaging" of the University of ZurichSNF R'Equip program 326030_177080/1USZ Innovation PoolViewRay Inc. (MASPAC study)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic Resonance (MR)-based synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) generation is an emerging promising technique, required for the transition from conventional planning workflows to MR-only radiotherapy planning. This shift aims to replace CT acquisition with a sCT improving both cost efficiency and burden to the patient. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown some of the best performance in this area. PURPOSE: This study aims to identify optimal approaches to improve the quality and clinical applicability of MR-based sCT generation for treatment planning by performing an extensive comparison of GAN architectures and parameters thereof. It focuses on the abdominal region, which still lacks certified medical products for sCT generation.

methodsIn order to improve the current state of deep learning technologies, we generated sCTs based on abdominal MR images of 154 cancer patients using GANs, varying the following parameters: (1) generator architectures (U-Net, ResNet); (2) GAN architectures trained in paired (Pix2Pix) and unpaired fashion (CycleGAN and CUT); (3) number of input-output channels (2D, 2.5D); (4) training set size. The quality of sCT generation was assessed by using both image similarity and dosimetric metrics; correlation between the two was evaluated. The dosimetric accuracy was evaluated through an automated process that compared the dose distributions of photon treatment plans calculated on sCT and CT images, using Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH) parameters for tumor and organs at risk.

resultsThe Pix2Pix model, trained in paired fashion with 2.5D input-output channels and a ResNet generator emerged as the best-performing model, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE, mean) of 63.21 HU, a planning target volume Dmean difference of -0.09%, and no outliers above 2% for other DVH parameters. This configuration addressed prior challenges of Pix2Pix with bone and rigid organ boundary generation, delivering robust results even for cases with significant air pockets. The 2D input-output channel configuration showed beneficial for GANs trained in unpaired fashion, achieving a mean MAE of 66.97 HU for CycleGAN and 69.49 HU for CUT. Both delivered clinically applicable results, with mean DVH discrepancies below 0.8%. Expanding the training set size was essential for minimizing outliers in dosimetric parameters. High correlation was observed between the image similarity metrics-MAE, MAE bones, structural similarity index measure-and target DVH parameters, with Pearson coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.9. However, within the clinically relevant range of DVH deviations (± 2%), stochastic variations obscured linear trends.

conclusionsThe study provided a new benchmark for the abdominal sCT generation task, showing its clinical applicability for treatment planning and further advancing the state-of-the-art. This study also confirmed that image similarity metrics alone can not reliably predict small dosimetric deviations within a clinical threshold; but contributed by identifying specific metrics that correlate with DVH discrepancies above ± 5%, offering valuable tools for training, evaluation, and standardization of reporting across studies.

Indexed as

AbdomenGenerative Adversarial NetworksImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisteddeep learninggenerative adversarial networksmedical image analysisMR‐only radiotherapysynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID40804793
PMCPMC12351101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.