ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
A cost-utility analysis of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Canada.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing the Global Disparities in Access to Treatment in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Spain, Greece, and Portugal.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Ten years of disease-modifying therapy in spinal muscular atrophy: lessons learned and future directions.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder caused by the loss of the SMN1 gene, with an estimated birth prevalence of about 1 in 10,000. Early intervention with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) significantly improves outcomes. This study evaluates the economic implications and health benefits of newborn screening (NBS) for SMA in Canada from the societal perspective.
methodsA decision analytic model was developed, which combined a decision tree for the screening algorithm and a Markov model for long-term health outcomes. The Markov model included health states based on WHO motor milestones. The population cohort of 357,903 live newborns reflects the 2022-2023 births in Canada. Screening is performed on dried blood spot testing which evaluates for biallelic deletions in SMN1. Cost inputs encompassed treatment and health state costs, while utility values reflected quality of life in each health state.
resultsNBS for SMA is expected to identify 37.1 (95% CI: 15.0, 70.7) newborns annually in Canada. Our analysis over a lifetime horizon and a discount rate of 1.5% shows NBS and early treatment has an incremental cost of -$146,187,000 (95% CI: -249,773,777 to - 17,890,034) and incremental benefit of 872 (95% CI: -193, 2329) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to no NBS and late treatment. This resulted in a mean ICER value of -$173,572/QALY.
conclusionThe decision analytic model indicated that overall NBS is cost-saving and more effective than no NBS and late treatment in the Canadian health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.