ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Predicting depression risk in middle-aged and elderly adults in China using CNN-BiLSTM-Attention mechanism and LSTM+SHAP framework.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of depression risk in middle-aged and elderly individuals is crucial for early identification and intervention. However, current research predominantly employs machine learning (ML) methods to predict depression risk, often overlooking the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of this risk.
methodsThis study utilized five waves of data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and constructed nine long short-term memory (LSTM) frameworks using CNN, BiLSTM, and Attention mechanisms to improve the accuracy and stability of depression risk prediction. Dynamic time windows were employed to handle time data sequences of inconsistent lengths, aligning with the structure of public databases. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was used to quantify and visualize the impact of each feature on the prediction results.
resultsAmong the nine LSTM frameworks, the CNN-BiLSTM-Attention model demonstrated a potential improvement in predictive performance (AUC between 0.68 and 0.71). It also exhibited the highest stability during feature reduction (∆AUC = 0.0052). SHAP analysis for the LSTM and CNN-BiLSTM-Attention models identified health status and functionality as key factors influencing depression risk in middle-aged and elderly individuals, with pain, gender, sleep duration, and IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living) being the most significant factors.
conclusionsThe LSTM + SHAP analysis framework showed significant application value in handling complex, high-dimensional spatiotemporal data. Future clinical interventions and public health policies should focus more on pain management and chronic disease management in middle-aged and elderly populations to reduce the risk of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.