ArticleBMC nursing2025
The lived experiences of pediatric nursing students following high-fidelity simulations and problem-based learning sessions.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immersive clinical learning using simulation and its impact on academic performance, satisfaction, self-confidence, and anxiety among pediatric nursing students.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Gender-specific pathways to leadership competency: the role of emotional intelligence and self-esteem among Saudi nursing students.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing students often find transitioning from classroom learning to clinical practice to be a challenging process, particularly in pediatric care where direct patient contact can be limited. High-fidelity simulation (HFS) and problem-based learning (PBL) have emerged as innovative educational approaches to help bridge this gap, offering students safe, structured environments to develop clinical competence.
methodsThis qualitative study explored the lived experiences of final-year pediatric nursing students who participated in HFS and PBL during their clinical rotations. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using Moustakas' transcendental phenomenological method. The study followed COREQ guidelines to ensure methodological transparency and rigor.
resultsFour themes emerged from the data: (1) Benefits of HFS and PBL, describing enhanced clinical confidence, decision-making, and practical skills; (2) Effect of Integrative Learning, highlighting the meaningful connection between theory and practice through guided reflection and teamwork; (3) Challenge to Respond to the Real Child, reflecting students' concerns about applying simulation-learned skills in emotionally demanding pediatric settings; and (4) Necessity of Collaboration, underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary engagement and broader clinical exposure.
conclusionThis study demonstrates how HFS and PBL can enhance students' preparation for pediatric clinical practice, enabling them to develop into competent and compassionate professionals. At the same time, the findings point to key areas for improvement, such as increasing simulation realism, strengthening faculty facilitation skills, and incorporating culturally responsive communication scenarios. A more intentional curriculum design, ongoing faculty development, and collaborative, interdisciplinary learning opportunities can be derived from these insights. Grounded in experiential learning theory, these strategies offer a pathway toward more holistic and contextually relevant nursing education. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.