ArticleBMC public health2025
Discomforting sensations associated with self-induced ear care experiences among patients visiting the ear, nose, and throat clinic in Ghana.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-induced ear care is considered a bad practice and is associated with several complications. Usually, it consists of activities and habits that an individual adopts with the view of self-treating and maintaining the cleanliness of the ears. Most patients in Ghana who report to the hospital with ear conditions often mention self-initiated ear care at home prior to their hospital visit. It is a worry due to the impact on an individual's hearing and overall quality of life. This study, therefore, aimed to explore and describe the self-induced ear care experiences among patients who access services at an Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic in Ghana. The study used an exploratory descriptive qualitative design among patients who have been practising self-induced ear care and patients who have experienced or are experiencing complications from self-induced ear care. Upon the consent of participants, interviews were conducted and audio-recorded. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. The study findings revealed that when participants encountered an ear problem, they preferred engaging in self-induced ear care based on their intentions, beliefs and evaluation of the consequences of their actions. They were poking the ears with their fingers, using safety/hair pins, chicken features, broomsticks, herbs, Dr. Côte d'Ivoire ointment, and cotton wool rather than reporting to the hospital. However, they became reoriented, dissociating themselves from self-induced ear care after encountering complications associated with it and gaining insight into the cause of their condition. In conclusion, stakeholders should sensitise the public to the dangers of self-induced ear care and develop educational strategies to address the knowledge gap and promote positive health-seeking behaviour towards all ear problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.