ArticleMedical physics2025
Development of anatomically variable digital Wistar rat phantoms for small animal imaging research.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital phantoms are valuable tools for evaluating small animal imaging systems. They can help optimize imaging parameters before live studies, supporting efforts to reduce animal use and refine experimental protocols. Wistar rats are widely used in preclinical imaging research due to their well-characterized biology and relevance to human disease. PURPOSE: This study develops a series of anatomically variable digital Wistar rat phantoms to support small animal imaging research.
methodsWe constructed 10 computational Wistar rat phantoms (six males, four females) with weights ranging from 188 to 474 g using high-resolution (200 µm) co-registered micro-CT and MRI data to generate detailed 3D anatomical models. The segmented organs and bones, including 35 distinct anatomical tissues, were fitted with smooth polygon mesh surfaces, ensuring flexibility for modeling motion, anatomical variation, and seamless voxelization at any resolution. To demonstrate the utility of the phantoms, we conducted a photon-counting CT (PCCT) simulation using a 279 g female model. The phantom was voxelized into material maps representing soft tissue, iodine contrast, and bone. Simulated PCCT projections were reconstructed using both analytical and iterative methods to compare image quality and accuracy of material decomposition.
resultsMeasured body sizes and organ masses confirm that the computational phantoms capture inter-subject anatomical variation. Iterative reconstruction outperformed analytical reconstruction in the PCCT simulation, reducing noise and improving material decomposition accuracy. Root mean square error (RMSE) across the water, iodine, and calcium maps decreased from 0.17 g/mL, 2.07 mg/mL, and 11.49 mg/mL to 0.02, 0.21, and 1.98, respectively.
conclusionsThe resulting anatomically variable digital phantoms will provide a valuable resource for preclinical imaging research, enabling the evaluation of imaging systems, optimization of imaging protocols, and validation of reconstruction algorithms across a representative range of anatomies. The demonstrated PCCT study highlights the potential of these phantoms for advancing virtual pre-clinical imaging trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.