ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
From Junk DNA to Genomic Treasure: Impacts of Transposable Element DNA, RNA, and Protein in Mammalian Development and Disease.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From Junk DNA to Genomic Treasure: Impacts of Transposable Element DNA, RNA, and Protein in Mammalian Development and Disease.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) have hijacked cellular machineries to replicate and spread throughout host genomes. TEs now make up a significant portion of eukaryotic genomes and play notable roles in genomic evolution, driving both speciation and providing raw material for genetic innovation. Barbara McClintock's pioneering work on these "jumping genes" laid the foundation for modern TE research; however, her paradigm-shifting theories in which TEs act as "controlling elements" were initially rejected due to the long-held belief that TEs were "junk" or parasitic DNA elements. Historically, the highly repetitive nature of TEs made it challenging to both identify and investigate functions. However, recent advances in genomics have greatly accelerated our understanding of TEs. Despite their potential to cause insertional mutagenesis and disease, many transposable elements have been co-opted by host genomes to contribute to gene regulation and development. In contrast to protein-coding genes that typically begin their journey as DNA, are transcribed into RNA, and reach their ultimate functional form as proteins, TEs can function as cis-regulatory DNA, functional RNA, and in rare cases, domesticated proteins and fusion events between TE and host genes. Driven by rapidly advancing technologies, the roles of TEs in both development and disease are being uncovered faster than ever, making current and future work an exciting continuation of Barbara McClintock's groundbreaking legacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.