ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025
Balancing the benefits and risks of social media on adolescent mental health in a post-pandemic world.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI and exacerbated suicide risk among vulnerable populations.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Social Media Addiction, Perceived Stress, Emotional Intelligence, and Cyberbullying Among Thai Adolescents During the Transition from the COVID-19 Pandemic to the Endemic Phase.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Debate: Social media in children and young people - time for a ban? Beyond the ban - empowering parents and schools to keep adolescents safe on social media.Child and adolescent mental health · 2025Article
- Connected but at Risk: Social Media Exposure and Psychiatric and Psychological Outcomes in Youth.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic intensified adolescents reliance on social media for connection, education, and entertainment, presenting both opportunities and risks for mental health. This viewpoint explores the dual nature of social media as a lifeline offering peer support and access to resources, especially for marginalized teens and a stressor, linked to anxiety, depression, and cyberbullying. Drawing on global evidence, including WHO and UNICEF data, it shows disparities in impact across socioeconomic, cultural, and gender contexts, with low-resource settings facing unique challenges like digital poverty amidst persistent post-pandemic effects. A multi-stakeholder framework is proposed to balance these dynamics, emphasizing parental and educator empowerment through digital literacy, tech industry accountability via adolescent-specific safeguards, clinical integration of social media screening in healthcare, and robust policy regulation for online safety. The urgency of action is underscored, with specific calls to governments, tech companies, clinicians, and researchers to collaborate on protecting adolescent well-being. This viewpoint argues that transforming social media into a safe space for mental health is a moral imperative, essential to prevent a generational crisis and ensure equity in the digital age.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.