Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804692›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025

Balancing the benefits and risks of social media on adolescent mental health in a post-pandemic world.

Augustus Osborne

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Augustus OsborneInstitute for Development, Western Area, Freetown, Sierra Leone. augustusosborne2@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0226-841X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic intensified adolescents reliance on social media for connection, education, and entertainment, presenting both opportunities and risks for mental health. This viewpoint explores the dual nature of social media as a lifeline offering peer support and access to resources, especially for marginalized teens and a stressor, linked to anxiety, depression, and cyberbullying. Drawing on global evidence, including WHO and UNICEF data, it shows disparities in impact across socioeconomic, cultural, and gender contexts, with low-resource settings facing unique challenges like digital poverty amidst persistent post-pandemic effects. A multi-stakeholder framework is proposed to balance these dynamics, emphasizing parental and educator empowerment through digital literacy, tech industry accountability via adolescent-specific safeguards, clinical integration of social media screening in healthcare, and robust policy regulation for online safety. The urgency of action is underscored, with specific calls to governments, tech companies, clinicians, and researchers to collaborate on protecting adolescent well-being. This viewpoint argues that transforming social media into a safe space for mental health is a moral imperative, essential to prevent a generational crisis and ensure equity in the digital age.

Identifiers

PMID40804692
PMCPMC12351798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.