Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804673›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Associated factors, barriers, and interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary time in academics: a systematic review.

Fiona Yu, Ritin Fernandez, Sherphard Chidarikire, Lisa Mackay, Melody Smith

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona YuSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. Fiona.Yu@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8747-3545
Ritin FernandezSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6143-7703
Sherphard ChidarikireSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8250-9876
Lisa MackaySchool of Sport and Recreation, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-5794
Melody SmithSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-2564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow physical activity and prolonged sedentary time harm health and psychological well-being. Being insufficiently active is associated with a risk of numerous non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes. Academics comprise a notable portion of the workforce and serve as important role models, yet their positions may involve many sedentary behaviours. The factors associated with their physical activity and sedentary behaviours are unclear. This review aimed to identify the associated factors, barriers, and the effectiveness of interventions in promoting physical activity among academics.

methodsSystematic review. The data were collated from CINAHL Ultimate, Cochrane, Medline (OVID), Scopus, and SPORTDiscus between March and April 2024. Studies were selected if they (1) involved participants employed in academics, including professional staff (2), investigated the physical activity or sedentary behaviours as a primary outcome and/or the associated factors, and (3) identified the effectiveness of physical activity interventions. Studies with full-text in English were selected if published in peer-reviewed journals before April 2024.

resultsOf the included 46 studies,12 demonstrated 63.10% (95% CI [54.70%, 71.10%], p < 0.0001, I2 = 96.40%) of participants had low physical activity, while 2 reported a long mean sedentary time per workday of 553.10 min (95% CI [29.51, 1135.72], p = 0.70 I2 = 0%). Various physical activity measures were utilised, and 42 associated factors were identified, categorised as sociodemographic (n = 7), psychological (n = 13), environmental (n = 6), work-related (n = 7), and health-related factors (n = 9). Sedentary behaviours were associated with burnout, lower prospective mood, and lower energetic arousal. Barriers to physical activity (n = 12) and interventions (n = 7) were identified.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that it is imperative to develop institutional strategies and interventions to promote physical activity in the academic population. The diversity and complexity of factors associated with physical activity indicate that further research with a large sample size and a consistent measure is needed to identify the needs of academics for physical activity promotion to enhance well-being.

Indexed as

ExerciseFacultyHealth PromotionSedentary BehaviorAcademiaHumansBreakEducatorEmployeeExerciseFacultyHigher educationLecturerProfessional teaching fellowSedentarySit

Identifiers

PMID40804673
PMCPMC12344990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.