ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Fibulin2 is a good diagnostic and prognostic indicator for sepsis.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by multiple organ dysfunction resulting from a maladjusted host response to infection. It remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early intervention for sepsis improves clinical outcomes. This study aimed to develop a diagnostic and prognostic indicator at the onset of sepsis.
methodsFrom January 2021 to December 2023, patients in the emergency department (ED) were evaluated for the use of Fibulin2 as a diagnostic and prognostic indicator for sepsis. The levels of Fibulin2 in plasma were detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the performance of Fibulin2 for predicting sepsis.
resultsThe level of serum Fibulin2 was significantly higher in patients with sepsis than in controls, and Fibulin2 had diagnostic value for sepsis and performed better than C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), the white blood cell count (WBC), the neutrophil ratio (NEU%), and D-dimer. Overall, Fibulin2 was upregulated in patients with septic shock compared with septic patients without shock, and Fibulin2 can be used to diagnose septic shock. Moreover, Fibulin2 was increased in patients who died at 28 days of sepsis and had the potential to predict 28-day mortality.
conclusionFibulin2 may serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for sepsis in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.