ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025
Neuromodulation of prefrontal cortex promotes deep processing during language comprehension: a tDCS/EEG study.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, to test a set of hypotheses about the extent to which the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes to revision and updating processes during language comprehension. Following 20 min of PFC-targeted, Active Control, or Sham tDCS, EEG was recorded while participants performed a widely used paradigm in which they read sentences containing plausible and implausible thematic roles (e.g. The actress/film-maker was directed by the film-maker/actress on set). This linguistic manipulation allowed us to examine comprehension under conditions when shallow processing and deeper processing yield conflicting meaning representations, which previous work has shown often engages revision and updating processes upon detection of the conflict. A different pattern of event-related potential responses was elicited when the same participants encountered implausible thematic roles during reading after receiving Sham compared with PFC-targeted tDCS. Specifically, N400 effects were found after Sham tDCS, whereas robust P600 effects were found after PFC-targeted tDCS (and to a significantly lesser extent, after Active Control tDCS). This suggests that while readers tended to treat implausible thematic roles as semantic anomalies after Sham tDCS, those same readers were more likely to detect conflict and engage in revision and updating in response to implausible thematic roles when in a state of heightened PFC stimulation. These results provide a novel demonstration of within-individual variability in language processing depending on current neurocognitive state and have implications for psycholinguistic theory about PFC contributions to revision and updating processes during language comprehension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.