Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804547›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Fixation Techniques Across Endoscopic Brow Lifts: A Scoping Review.

Hector Caceres, Syed Naqi Raza, Tapasya Katta, Alexandra Savage, Luke Anderson, Shawn Barker, Jorge de la Torre

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hector CaceresHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. hcaceres@uab.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4852-5431
Syed Naqi RazaHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Tapasya KattaHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Alexandra SavageHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Luke AndersonHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Shawn BarkerDepartment of Surgery Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jorge de la TorreHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its inception, the endoscopic brow lift has gained popularity as a minimally invasive solution for treating brow ptosis. Various fixation techniques have been developed, including cortical tunnel bone fixations, reabsorbable devices like Endotine, adhesives, and simple sutures. Despite these methods, there is paucity in the literature evaluating patient satisfaction and outcomes between techniques. This scoping review aims to evaluate the existing literature on endoscopic brow lifts, focused on reporting outcomes and methods of reporting patient satisfaction. By synthesizing this information, we hope to provide clinicians with a clearer understanding of how different techniques impact patient experiences and surgical results. Our goal is to enhance clinical practice and inform future research. A licensed librarian conducted a computerized search using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases to identify papers from inception to June 2024. After analysis, 27 papers were included in this study. Studies were included if they examined endoscopic brow lifts using a single fixation technique and reported surgical outcome data. Due to heterogeneity in complication reporting, complications were categorized into aesthetic, neurological, wound-related, and other. This review analyzed 2519 patients across 11 fixation methods. Bone tunnel (649 patients), Endotine (333), suture (906), and screw fixation (216) were the most common. Other methods were reported in one study each. Among studies reporting gender, 85.9% were female. Ages ranged from 38.8 to 72 years, with follow-up ranging from 5.1 months to 4 years. While 74% of studies addressed patient satisfaction, only 22% quantified it. Bone tunnel fixation had the lowest complication profile across all four categories. Screw fixations had the highest rate of complications across all categories. Overall, neurological complications (11.69%) were the most common, followed by aesthetic (6.27%), other (4.94%), and wound-related (1.19%). The longevity of the endoscopic approach to address brow ptosis has driven the development of various fixation methods. Despite this, there is no clear distinction of the best approach due to the heterogeneity of the literature in reporting both surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Our review suggests bone tunnel fixation appears to have a favorable safety profile, while screw fixation is associated with higher rates of complications. Notably, our findings indicate that minimal complications were seen across all studies, supporting the efficacy of the endoscopic brow lift technique. There is a significant gap in the consistent reporting of complications across the literature that, if addressed, could lead to improved patient outcomes.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

BlepharoptosisEndoscopyEyebrowsRhytidoplastyEstheticsFemaleHumansMalePatient SatisfactionSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeEndobrowEndoscopic brow liftsFixation techniques

Identifiers

PMID40804547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.