ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Noninvasive evaluation of treatment-related protein expression status in advanced gastric cancer using dynamic nomograms with dual-energy CT: a multicenter study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on the application of dual energy CT in gastric diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesProliferation marker Ki-67 and immune checkpoint Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) are both proteins associated with tumor treatment response. To develop and validate two dynamic nomograms from dual-energy CT (DECT) for noninvasive evaluation of the expression status of these two proteins in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and explore their associations with treatment response. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this multicenter prospective and retrospective study, eligible AGC participants who underwent DECT scans were recruited into two study groups (Ki-67 and PD-L1 groups), with their clinical and DECT characteristics collected and measured. The prediction models (Ki-67 dynamic nomogram (KIDN) and PD-L1 dynamic nomogram (PDDN)) were constructed by logistic regression classifier, respectively, and two online calculators were established based on models. The performance of nomograms was comprehensively evaluated.
resultsIn total, 459 and 417 eligible patients were analyzed in the Ki-67 and PD-L1 groups, respectively. The nomograms discriminating Ki-67 and PD-L1 achieved AUCs of 0.755 and 0.726, respectively, in the external validation cohort. Additionally, the two nomograms significantly or slightly outperformed any single predictor in both the training and validation cohorts. In both cohorts, KIDN and PDDN showed favorable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, all p < 0.05) and clinical utility confirmed by decision curve analysis. Moreover, they demonstrated prognostic performance consistent with actual biomarkers and were associated with clinical response to immuno-chemotherapy (both p < 0.05).
conclusionThe dynamic nomograms, which integrate clinical features and DECT quantitative parameters, enable noninvasive evaluation of treatment-related protein expression in AGC. KEY POINTS: Question Noninvasive tools for accurately evaluating Ki-67 and PD-L1 expression status in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are currently inadequate. Findings Dual-energy CT-based nomograms demonstrated favorable performance in evaluating Ki-67 and PD-L1 expression status and were associated with response to immuno-chemotherapy in AGC. Clinical relevance We developed online calculators based on prediction models that may serve as a supplement to current invasive methods (e.g., immunohistochemistry), potentially aiding therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40804511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.