Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804511›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Noninvasive evaluation of treatment-related protein expression status in advanced gastric cancer using dynamic nomograms with dual-energy CT: a multicenter study.

Yiyang Liu, Yaru You, Lihong Chen, Jing Li, Mengchen Yuan, Bo Duan, Huiting Ge, Xuejun Chen, Li Yang, Xingzhi Chen and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Yiyang Liu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-6082
Yaru You *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lihong Chen *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.
Jing Li *Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Henan Cancer Hospital), Zhengzhou, China.
Mengchen YuanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bo DuanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.
Huiting GeDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.
Xuejun ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Henan Cancer Hospital), Zhengzhou, China.
Li YangDepartment of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.
Xingzhi ChenDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise and League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Linfeng LiSiemens Healthineers Digital Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Luhao LiuCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yue ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yiming LiMedical Imaging Center, The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City, Shangqiu, China.
Bei DongMedical Imaging Center, The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City, Shangqiu, China.
Qian JiaDepartment of Radiology, Sanmenxia Central Hospital, Sanmenxia, China.
Chengwei RuanDepartment of Radiology, Sanmenxia Central Hospital, Sanmenxia, China.
Diansen ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Zongbin HouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Zihao ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. zzh2020@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-0010
Qingyu JiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China. jiqingyusci@163.com.
Jianbo GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. fccgaojb@zzu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9769-1335

Funding

The Medical Science and Technology Innovation Award Project of Henan Academy of Innovations in Medical Science CXIL202404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProliferation marker Ki-67 and immune checkpoint Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) are both proteins associated with tumor treatment response. To develop and validate two dynamic nomograms from dual-energy CT (DECT) for noninvasive evaluation of the expression status of these two proteins in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and explore their associations with treatment response. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this multicenter prospective and retrospective study, eligible AGC participants who underwent DECT scans were recruited into two study groups (Ki-67 and PD-L1 groups), with their clinical and DECT characteristics collected and measured. The prediction models (Ki-67 dynamic nomogram (KIDN) and PD-L1 dynamic nomogram (PDDN)) were constructed by logistic regression classifier, respectively, and two online calculators were established based on models. The performance of nomograms was comprehensively evaluated.

resultsIn total, 459 and 417 eligible patients were analyzed in the Ki-67 and PD-L1 groups, respectively. The nomograms discriminating Ki-67 and PD-L1 achieved AUCs of 0.755 and 0.726, respectively, in the external validation cohort. Additionally, the two nomograms significantly or slightly outperformed any single predictor in both the training and validation cohorts. In both cohorts, KIDN and PDDN showed favorable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, all p < 0.05) and clinical utility confirmed by decision curve analysis. Moreover, they demonstrated prognostic performance consistent with actual biomarkers and were associated with clinical response to immuno-chemotherapy (both p < 0.05).

conclusionThe dynamic nomograms, which integrate clinical features and DECT quantitative parameters, enable noninvasive evaluation of treatment-related protein expression in AGC. KEY POINTS: Question Noninvasive tools for accurately evaluating Ki-67 and PD-L1 expression status in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are currently inadequate. Findings Dual-energy CT-based nomograms demonstrated favorable performance in evaluating Ki-67 and PD-L1 expression status and were associated with response to immuno-chemotherapy in AGC. Clinical relevance We developed online calculators based on prediction models that may serve as a supplement to current invasive methods (e.g., immunohistochemistry), potentially aiding therapeutic decision-making.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenKi-67 AntigenNomogramsStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanKi-67 AntigenImmune checkpoint proteinKi-67 antigenNomogramsStomach neoplasmsTomography, (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.