SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an individual patient pooled meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: Interpreting divergent randomized evidence and guiding patient selection.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma: a milestone shift in management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a highly common neurosurgical condition with significant burden in the elderly, and patients aged ≥ 80 represent nearly one-third of cases. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a promising treatment method to reduce hematoma growth and recurrence; however, octogenarians and nonagenarians remain underrepresented in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate outcomes of MMAE in this high-risk group. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through March 2025 for studies reporting patients aged ≥ 80 years treated with MMAE for cSDH. Individual-level data were extracted and pooled. Clinical, procedural, and radiographic outcomes were summarized. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified predictors of hematoma resolution and extended hospital stay (LOS ≥ 75th percentile). Twenty-six studies including 86 patients (mean age 83 years; 36% ≥90 years) met inclusion. Most were male (70%) and had comorbidities such as hypertension (57%) and diabetes (21%). MMAE was performed alone in 64% of cases and with surgery in 36%. Transfemoral access was used in 74%, while transradial access (associated with shorter LOS) was underutilized, especially in patients ≥ 90 (3%). Complication and in-hospital mortality rates were low (5.8% and 1.2%, respectively). At discharge, 81% returned home. Complete hematoma resolution occurred in 56%, more likely with adjunctive coiling (aOR 4.01) and less likely with antithrombotic use (aOR 0.12). Extended LOS was associated with age ≥ 90 (aOR 2.1) and general anesthesia (aOR 1.7). MMAE is safe and effective in patients aged ≥ 80. While outcomes are favorable across age groups, transradial access and conscious sedation may reduce hospital stay and anesthesia-related risks in this population. Future trials should prioritize inclusion of this high-risk group to guide age-appropriate, evidence-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.