ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Establishing a fault management system for da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: identification, troubleshooting, and rapid resumption.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a fault identification, troubleshooting, and rapid recovery system for da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (referred to as the "robot") to enhance clinical decision-making and ensure patient safety during robotic procedures. We retrospectively analyzed 4,784 surgeries performed using the "Si" robot at our hospital from September 2014 to May 2023, identifying 105 fault instances, and 776 surgeries using the "Xi" robot from April 2022 to May 2023, with 18 fault instances. Fault repair videos, images, and data from both robots were collected, supplemented by technical support from Chindex Medical Limited and related literature. Based on these data, we established a fault identification, troubleshooting, and rapid recovery system. The system's effectiveness was evaluated by comparing fault rates, fault categories, nurses' accuracy in fault identification and troubleshooting, and repair times before and after system implementation. Significant differences were observed in fault rates, fault categories, nurses' accuracy in fault identification and troubleshooting, and repair times before and after system implementation for both the "Si" and "Xi" robots (all P < 0.05). The "Si" robot showed a significant reduction in non-recoverable fault rates (P < 0.05), while the "Xi" robot demonstrated a significant improvement in recoverable fault rates (P < 0.05). The developed system improved nurses' adherence to operational standards, enhanced fault identification accuracy, reduced repair times, increased robotic surgery efficiency, and improved nursing collaboration quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40804466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.