ArticleScientific reports2025
Phenotypic variation in otolith shape of American shad across eastern North American rivers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Otolith shape analysis has been widely applied to study population structure and environmental influences in various fish species. However, research on American shad (Alosa sapidissima) otolith morphology remains scarce, despite its potential to provide insights into population differentiation and environmental adaptation. This study analyses otolith contour shape from 1141 American shad collected between 2000 and 2023 across eleven large rivers from Canada to Florida. Using a wavelet transform framework based on the à trous algorithm and B3-spline wavelet, we quantified otolith shape variability and assessed its effectiveness for population discrimination. Principal Component Analysis revealed significant shape variation, with key differences in the rostrum, antirostrum, and posterior region. Wavelet analysis identified two primary otolith morphologies-upper and lower rostrum-geographically structured along a latitudinal gradient. A Multilayer Perceptron neural network successfully classified individuals with 90.9% accuracy, highlighting strong population differentiation, particularly in the St. Lawrence and Delaware rivers. Cluster analysis identified five morphotypes with distinct spatial distributions, suggesting a role for local environmental conditions in shaping otolith morphology. These findings underscore the utility of otolith shape analysis in deciphering population structure and highlight potential links between environmental variation and phenotypic plasticity in American shad.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.