Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804432›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

Study protocol testing feasibility of the Comfort Measures Only Time out (CMOT) to reduce distress during palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation.

Abigail G Fischer, Margaret L Campbell, Margaret M Hayes, Richard M Schwartzstein, Douglas B White, Susan L Mitchell, Corey R Fehnel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05861323 (Feasibility of the Comfort Measures Only Time Out), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05861323 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Feasibility of the Comfort Measures Only Time Out (CMOT) to Reduce Distress During Palliative Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2023 to 2026Enrolled184ConditionsEnd of Life, Respiratory Failure, Ventilatory Failure, ComaArmsComfort Measures Only Time out (CMOT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abigail G FischerBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St, Lowry 9A, Boston, 02215, MA , USA.
Margaret L CampbellWayne State University, College of Nursing, Detroit, USA.
Margaret M HayesBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St, Lowry 9A, Boston, 02215, MA , USA.
Richard M SchwartzsteinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St, Lowry 9A, Boston, 02215, MA , USA.
Douglas B WhiteUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.
Susan L MitchellBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St, Lowry 9A, Boston, 02215, MA , USA.
Corey R FehnelBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St, Lowry 9A, Boston, 02215, MA , USA. cfehnel@bidmc.hardvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-5809

Funding

Intensive Palliative Care: Improving the Process of Palliative Ventilator Withdrawal Among Critically Ill Older AdultsK23AG066929 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI FEHNEL, COREY R · 2020 to 2024
$972k
NIA NIH HHS 5K23AG066929-05NIA NIH HHS K23 AG066929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDistress is experienced by more than 30% of patients during palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation at the end of life in the intensive care unit. There is a lack of high-quality evidence for specific approaches to risk factor identification and management of distress during this process. Structured "time-outs" and checklist interventions improve surgical outcomes and have been widely adopted in procedural care, but they have not been tested for use at end-of-life in intensive care unit settings.

methodsWe describe the development and planned testing of a novel time-out checklist intervention, the Comfort Measures Only Time Out (CMOT) in a non-randomized single arm pilot study. Intervention development was guided by published literature and a structured inter-professional advisory panel. The intervention will be tested by clinical teams caring for 46 patients undergoing palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers, and respiratory therapists will convene within an hour before withdrawal of mechanical ventilation to complete the checklist. Implementation outcomes, including feasibility, will be measured by a 12-question survey and by clinician protocol adherence. Effect size calculations will determine power for future randomized controlled trials testing efficacy of the CMOT in reducing patient distress. DISCUSSION: This protocol will pilot test the feasibility of the CMOT, a structured time-out and checklist intervention, for WMV in the ICU. The study will inform potential changes to the protocol and intervention for a future randomized control trial. The CMOT is grounded in a quality and safety framework already adopted in procedural and critical care settings. Given high rates of distress, the CMOT will fill an identified gap in evidence surrounding the process of WMV.

trial registrationClinical trials.gov ( NCT05861323 ); 16 May 2023.

Identifiers

PMID40804432
PMCPMC12345127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.