Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804411›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2025

Does expander design influence the risk of asymmetric palatal expansion? A retrospective cohort study.

Gilles Claeys, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Johannes Kleinheinz, Stefaan Bergé, Tong Xi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gilles ClaeysDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, HB 6500, The Netherlands.
Shankeeth VinayahalingamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, HB 6500, The Netherlands.
Johannes KleinheinzDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universitätsklinik Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W30, D-48149, Münster, Germany.
Stefaan BergéDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, HB 6500, The Netherlands.
Tong XiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, HB 6500, The Netherlands. Tong.Xi@radboudumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnplanned asymmetric palatal expansion following Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SARME) can result in a poor esthetic outcome or an unstable occlusion. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between expander design and asymmetric expansion.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, preoperative and postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients treated with SARME were randomly selected from the Radboud University medical imaging database. Patients were divided into two groups according to the used expander: (1) bone-borne distractor (TPD); (2) tooth-borne expander (Hyrax). Transverse dental and skeletal maxillary expansion were quantified using landmark-based measurements. A left-right difference of more than one millimeter was considered as asymmetric. Paired and independent t-tests were performed to analyze the asymmetry within and between the groups. Linear regression analyses were used to identify predictor variables for asymmetric expansion.

results60 patients were enrolled into the study (mean age 30.3 ± 9.1 years; 24 male and 36 female), 30 in the TPD group and 30 in the hyrax group. The mean anterior maxillary dental and skeletal expansion was 3.9 ± 2.7 mm and 2.2 ± 1.4 mm. The mean posterior maxillary dental and skeletal expansion was 5.2 ± 2.7 mm and 2.3 ± 1.6 mm. No differences in dental and skeletal expansion were found between the TPD and hyrax groups (p > 0.05). 18 patients in the TPD group and 21 patients in the hyrax group exhibited anterior dental asymmetry (p = 0.42) whereas 10 and 11 patients exhibited anterior skeletal asymmetry (p = 0.79). Linear regression analyses demonstrated that the type of expander does not appear to be a predictor variable for asymmetric expansion.

conclusionAsymmetric maxillary opening occurred frequently after SARME irrespective of the type of expander used. Considering the similar postoperative outcome of hyrax and TPD, SARME with a hyrax expander may be preferred as it is less surgically invasive and more cost effective.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliance DesignPalatal Expansion TechniqueAdultCohort StudiesCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAsymmetryDental expansionExpander designSARMESkeletal expansion

Identifiers

PMID40804411
PMCPMC12344892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.