Trial reportBMC public health2025
Malaria-malnutrition interaction: prevalence, risk factors, and the impact of intermittent preventive therapy for malaria on nutritional status of school-age children in Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania - A cross-sectional survey and a randomized controlled open-label trial.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03640403 (Effectiveness and Safety of Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria Using Either Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or Artesunate-amodiaquine in Reducing Malaria Related Morbidities and Improving Cognitive Ability in School-aged Children in Tanzania), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Safety of Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria Using Either Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or Artesunate-amodiaquine in Reducing Malaria Related Morbidities and Improving Cognitive Ability in School-aged Children in Tanzania: A Controlled Randomised Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWHO and the Lancet reported that malaria and malnutrition form a double health burden in low and middle-income countries. Despite the massive implementation of malaria control interventions, there is scarce evidence on the impact of intermittent preventive therapy (IPTsc) for malaria on the nutritional status of school-age children. In this study, we aimed to determine malnutrition risk factors and evaluate the impact of IPTsc for malaria on the nutritional status of school-age children in Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania.
methodsWe analysed secondary data from a cross-sectional baseline survey and a randomized controlled open-label trial conducted in Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania. Participants of our study were children of age 5-15 years. Baseline data collection was carried out between February-April 2019. The study continued through December 2020, during which participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP), artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), or a control group, using a 3-arms balanced block design with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. Intervention treatments were administered at recruitment, 4 months, and 8 months of the trial. Data were analysed using logistic regression and a linear mixed model.
findingsAt baseline, the prevalence of malaria was 27%. The prevalence of being underweight among children of ≤ 10 years was 23%. Among all children surveyed at baseline, 21% were stunted and 28% were either thin or severely thin. The odds of stunting were 78% higher (AOR = 1.78, 95%CI = [1.36, 2.33], P < 0.001) among children who had malaria compared with those who did not have malaria. Children from low socioeconomic status (SES) had higher odds of being underweight (AOR = 1.50, 95%CI = [1.13,2.01], P = 0.006) compared with their high SES counterparts. During the intervention, change in mean weight, height, and BMI over time as estimated from age-treatment interaction was not significantly different in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) and Artesunate amodiaquine (ASAQ) treatment groups compared with the control group.
conclusionAlthough substantial efforts to control malaria are ongoing in the study setting, the dual burden of malaria and malnutrition remains significant. Anti-malaria use for preventive purpose may not be sufficient to improve nutritional status, reinforcing that integrated interventions are required to address both malaria and malnutrition. Public health efforts should combine malaria control with nutrition programs, including community-driven strategies to enhance sustainable nutrition education and access to adequate food at home and school. Protocol for the parent study that generated these data was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03640403) on Aug 21, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.