ArticleBMC oral health2025
Efficacy comparison between dentofacial orthopedic treatment and adenotonsillectomy on children with obstructive sleep apnea and skeletal class II malocclusion: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of numerical simulation of upper airway flow field in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea with adenoid hypertrophy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Controlled Prospective Evidence of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Efficacy in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A longitudinal cohort study of sleep-disordered breathing in children: interrelationships with craniofacial morphology, malocclusion, and intervention outcomes.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the effects of dentofacial orthopedic treatment (DOT) and adenotonsillectomy (AT) in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) children with skeletal Class II malocclusion and adenotonsillar hypertrophy (ATH), focusing on changes in sleep respiratory function, anatomic and aerodynamic characteristics of upper airway (UA).
methodsIn this retrospective study, 38 OSA children (mean age: 8.42 years, 15 females and 23 males) were included consecutively. Patients were categorized into two groups: DOT group (n = 20) and AT group (n = 18). Baseline (T0) and follow-up (T1) assessments involved polysomnography and radiological examinations to evaluate improvements in sleep quality as well as changes in craniofacial morphology and UA variables. Aerodynamic parameters such as airflow velocity, airway resistance, and wall shear stress were quantified using computational fluid dynamics.
resultsIn the comparative analysis of sleep respiratory functions, there were no significant differences in apnea-hypopnea index changes between the treatment groups (DOT group: -3.72/h, AT group: -3.32/h, P = 0.600). In the DOT group, UA's volume average enlargements were observed in the nasopharynx, palatopharynx, glossopharynx, and hypopharynx by 54.5%, 41.6%, 34.0%, and 22.5%, respectively. In comparison, the AT group showed enlargements of 66.0%, 20.1%, 62.9%, and - 1.0%, respectively. In terms of UA aerodynamic characteristics, there were no significant differences between two groups.
conclusionsIn OSA children with skeletal Class II malocclusion and ATH, DOT as a non-invasive approach, has shown improvements in respiratory function comparable to AT, as evidenced by changes in the UA's anatomical and aerodynamic characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.