Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804378›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2025

Global prevalence and correlation of intestinal parasitic infections in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maryam Hataminejad, Bahareh Basirpour, Melika Baharlou, Masoumeh Gholami Koohestan, Hajar Ziaei Hezarjaribi, Bahman Rahimi Esboei, Shirzad Gholami, Seyed Abdollah Hosseini, Reza Saberi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A hidden danger in cancer patients: intestinal parasites.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  7. European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maryam Hataminejad *Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.
Bahareh Basirpour *Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.
Melika BaharlouStudent Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.
Masoumeh Gholami KoohestanDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hajar Ziaei HezarjaribiDepartment of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.
Bahman Rahimi EsboeiDepartment of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.
Shirzad GholamiDepartment of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran.
Seyed Abdollah HosseiniDepartment of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran. Hosseini4030@gmail.com.
Reza SaberiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. reza.sab.68@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, and researchers continue to explore its underlying factors. This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to clarify the prevalence and potential association between intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) and CRC.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across databases that contain articles in English, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, to identify articles published up to October 2024 that reported on the prevalence of IPIs in CRC patients. Selected studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence and odds ratios (ORs) for association IPIs in CRC.

resultsA total of 70 studies were included, and 46 case-control and cross-sectional studies were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of IPIs among CRC patients was determined to be 19.67% (95% CI: 14.81% to 25.02%). Furthermore, individuals with parasitic infections exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of developing CRC, with an OR of 3.61 (95% CI: 2.41-5.43).

conclusionThis study demonstrated a significantly high prevalence of parasitic infections, including both helminths and protozoa, among patients with CRC. The analysis revealed a notable association between IPIs and CRC, suggesting that these infections may contribute to the development and progression of the cancer.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticGlobal HealthHumansPrevalenceColorectal cancerIntestinal parasitic infectionMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40804378
PMCPMC12351808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.