ArticleBMC nursing2025
The impact of graded nursing interventions based on quantitative risk assessment on psychological stress responses in patients undergoing resection for primary liver cancer.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the impact of graded nursing interventions based on a quantitative risk assessment system on psychophysiological stress responses in patients undergoing resection for primary liver cancer.
methodsA total of 80 patients who underwent liver cancer surgery in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery department of a tertiary Grade A hospital between January 2023 and December 2023 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 40 patients in each, using a random number table method. The control group received routine nursing care, whereas the observation group received a graded nursing plan based on a quantitative assessment system.
resultsBefore the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in Psychological Stress Response Questionnaire (SRQ) scores between the two groups. Following the intervention, SRQ scores decreased in both groups, with significantly lower scores in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Similarly, no statistically significant differences in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores were observed between the groups before the intervention. After the intervention, both groups showed lower HAMA and HAMD scores than pre-intervention levels, with the observation group exhibiting significantly lower scores than the control group (P < 0.001).
conclusionGraded nursing interventions based on quantitative assessment can effectively reduce postoperative psychological stress and negative emotional responses in patients undergoing surgery for primary liver cancer, thereby promoting recovery.
trial registrationISRCTN81587743, Registration date: 25/04/2025. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ISRCTN81587743.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.