Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804352›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Conditional POD for predicting extreme events in turbulent flow time signals.

David Martín, Joan Grau, Lluís Jofre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David MartínDepartment of Fluid Mechanics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, 08019, Spain.
Joan GrauDepartment of Fluid Mechanics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, 08019, Spain.
Lluís JofreDepartment of Fluid Mechanics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, 08019, Spain. lluis.jofre@upc.edu.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101040379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extreme events in turbulent flows are rare, fast excursions from typical behavior that can significantly impact systems performance and reliability. Predicting such events is challenging due to their intermittent nature and rare occurrence, which limits the effectiveness of data-intensive methods. This paper, therefore, introduces a novel data-driven approach for on-the-fly early-stage prediction of extreme events in time signals. The method identifies the most energetic time-only POD mode of an ensemble of time segments leading to extreme events in a signal. High similarity between incoming signals and the computed mode serves as an indicator of an approaching extreme event. A support vector machine is employed to classify the signals as preceding an extreme event or not. This approach is fully data-driven and requires minimal training data, making it particularly suitable for significantly rare events. The method is applied to predict extreme dissipation events in a wall-bounded shear flow at different Reynolds numbers and wall distances, demonstrating robust performance across a range of intermittency levels. Even with limited training data, leading to an imperfect representation of the extreme event statistics, the method provides predictions at lead times that match and usually exceed the timeframe for which the Hankel-DMD method remains accurate. This opens up the possibility of using the conditional POD method to flag incoming extreme events so that potentially unreliable forecasts from signal prediction methods, such as Hankel-DMD, can be discarded or their forecasting horizon shortened.

Identifiers

PMID40804352
PMCPMC12350934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.