ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning model with machine vision system for recognizing type of the food during the food consumption.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The food industry prioritizes quality control and product knowledge, emphasizing factors like quantity, freshness, and color. This research addresses Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) focused on controlling food consumption, promoting health, reducing energy usage, and minimizing environmental impact. The primary objective was to utilize machine vision and deep learning to identify consumed food products. The study categorizes food into 32 classes, divided into three main categories, and includes the documentation of images and videos captured during consumption across various situations. Initially, the dataset comprised 12,000 images in 16 classes and 24,000 images in 32 classes, which were subsequently augmented to yield 60,000 and 120,000 images, respectively. The augmented datasets were then processed through nine popular deep learning architectures, identifying ResNet50, EfficientNetB5, B6, and B7 as the most effective architectures. An essential step involved updating hyperparameters, including image size, batch size, learning rate, and optimizer settings, to enhance convergence rates and accuracy. The EfficientNetB7 model was adapted for further testing and compared against two prominent optimizers, Adam and Lion. Ultimately, the EfficientNetB7 model with the Lion optimizer was chosen for the dataset. The results of this deep learning algorithm demonstrated remarkable performance, achieving 100% accuracy in identifying images of food-consumed products within 16 classes when using EfficientNetB7 and the Lion optimizer. For the 32-class case, the accuracy reached 99%, with the mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) recorded at 0.0079, 0.035, and 0.18, respectively. These findings illustrate the robustness of the adjusted dataset in alignment with the designed deep learning architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.