ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction and validation of a predictive in-hospital mortality nomogram in patients with staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for mortality risk in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for hospital mortality in adult patients withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to construct and validate a predictive nomogram to evaluate in-hospital mortality of patients with S.aureus BSI. A 10-year retrospective cohort design was conducted to analyze data from 484 patients diagnosed with S. aureus BSI between 2014 and 2023. Clinical data from 339 patients (2014 to 2021) were harnessed in training cohort to develop a predictive nomogram, which underwent rigorous internal validation. An independent cohort of 145 patients (2022 to 2023) were collected for external validation. The prognostic performance of the model was comprehensively assessed using AUC, calibration curve, and DCA. We ultimately identified several key factors that were incorporated into the final prognostic nomogram: the ECFC score, the CCI score, procalcitonin levels, admission to the intensive care unit, and multimicrobial BSI. Internal validation was assessed via 5-fold cross-validation, repeated 400 times on the training cohort, yielding an average AUC value of 0.930 vs. 0.940 of the total. External validation further confirmed the nomogram's accuracy, with an AUC value of 0.929. Additionally, the calibration curves and DCAs revealed excellent consistency and substantial net clinical benefits in both cohorts. The development of this predictive nomogram marks a substantial breakthrough in the management of patients with S. aureus BSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.