ArticleScientific reports2025
A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of pain specialists on prescribing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioid prescribing for patients with chronic non-cancer pain is common despite issues associated with long-term efficacy, functional improvement, and safety. Pain specialists assess many patients with chronic non-cancer pain, but their experiences of this situation are not well represented in prior qualitative research. The aim of this study was to explore pain specialists' experiences of prescribing opioids to patients with chronic non-cancer pain. We adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Pain specialists in Sweden were recruited by purposive and snowball sampling. Participants were digitally interviewed, audio and video were recorded, and interviews translated verbatim. Data was analyzed through manifest inductive content analysis. Twenty pain specialists were interviewed. Qualitative content analysis revealed that the pain specialists' experiences were represented by two main categories: (1) Navigating the doctor-patient relationship, and (2) Challenges and opportunities when prescribing opioids. The first main category describes the relational demands associated with opioid prescribing and includes communication, conflicts, managing expectations, and the emotional and ethical aspects of prescribing opioids. The second main category describes handling complexity and heterogeneity, organizational aspects, and the doctor's due diligence when prescribing opioids. Our results offer new insights into pain specialists' experiences of prescribing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain, offering health care professionals guidance for responsible opioid prescribing. Pain specialists highlight the need for structured pain assessments and identify system-level improvements, such as allocating sufficient time, enabling team-based care, and continued education initiatives, to support safe opioid use in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.