Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804326›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Pythagorean fuzzy N-bipolar soft sets-based multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainability evaluation and risk assessment in manufacturing industries.

Maha M Saeed, Sagvan Y Musa, Baravan A Asaad, Zanyar A Ameen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maha M SaeedDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, P.O.Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Sagvan Y MusaDepartment of Mathematics, College of Education, University of Zakho, Zakho, 42002, Iraq.
Baravan A AsaadDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, 42002, Iraq.
Zanyar A AmeenDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Duhok, Duhok, 42001, Duhok, Iraq. zanyar.ameen@uod.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability evaluation in manufacturing industries is increasingly vital for promoting responsible growth and long-term competitiveness amid environmental, social, and economic challenges. Effective decision-making (DM) under uncertainty is crucial for managing multiple, often conflicting sustainability objectives. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid model, termed Pythagorean fuzzy N-bipolar soft sets (PFNBSSs), which integrates Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs), N-soft sets (NSSs), and bipolar soft sets (BSSs) within a unified multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. For theoretical purposes, we define basic operations and algebraic properties of PFNBSSs, supported by illustrative examples. To demonstrate practical applicability, the PFNBSS model is applied to assess sustainability practices in manufacturing industries through two numerical examples: one focusing on positive and negative sustainability indicators, and another emphasizing comparative sustainability risk assessment across diverse manufacturing sectors. Detailed interpretations of computational results and their relevance in practical DM are provided. This is followed by a comparative analysis confirming the superior discrimination power and expressive capability of the PFNBSS model over existing alternatives. The paper concludes with a critical evaluation of the model and suggestions for future research.

Indexed as

MCDMN-soft setsPythagorean fuzzy N-bipolar soft setsPythagorean fuzzy setsSustainable Manufacturing Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40804326
PMCPMC12350664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.